The safety manager occupies a critical position within the PCBU duty framework established by the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. While the PCBU itself bears the primary duty of care under section 19, the safety manager is the person most often charged with implementing that duty on a day-to-day basis. This role carries significant legal exposure because regulators routinely examine whether the safety management system was adequate and whether the person responsible for maintaining it exercised reasonable diligence. Under the WHS Regulation 2025, the safety manager must ensure that hazard identification, risk assessment, and control verification processes operate effectively across every workplace the PCBU controls or influences.
s.19 WHS Act 2011
Primary Duty Section
WHS Regulation 2025
Regulation Framework
1 July 2026
Section 26A Commencement
1 December 2026
WEL Transition Date
Immediate for notifiable incidents
Incident Notification
Reg 55C WHS Regulation 2025
Psychosocial Regulation
Section 19 of the WHS Act 2011 requires every PCBU to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of workers and other persons at the workplace. The safety manager translates this broad obligation into a functioning management system. This includes maintaining a risk register that captures all foreseeable hazards, establishing safe work method statements for high-risk construction work, and verifying that controls remain effective through scheduled inspections and audits. The WHS Regulation 2025 introduces additional requirements around psychosocial hazards under Regulation 55C and updated workplace exposure limits taking effect 1 December 2026. Safety managers must update their monitoring programs and ensure atmospheric testing equipment is calibrated against the new WEL values. Failure to maintain current systems is treated by regulators as a failure of the PCBU duty, and the safety manager is typically the first person investigators interview when determining whether the duty was met.
A safety manager must maintain a work health and safety management system that satisfies the requirements of the WHS Regulation 2025 and aligns with the applicable codes of practice that become binding under Section 26A from 1 July 2026. The management system must include documented procedures for hazard identification, risk assessment, control implementation, emergency planning, incident investigation, and worker consultation. Each element must be reviewed at intervals that reflect the risk profile of the workplace. High-risk industries such as construction, mining, and chemical manufacturing require more frequent review cycles. The safety manager must also maintain training records that demonstrate every worker has received task-specific induction, competency verification, and refresher training within the prescribed intervals. Under the WHS Regulation 2025, the management system must now explicitly address psychosocial hazards including bullying, harassment, fatigue, and role ambiguity. Regulators assess system adequacy by examining documentation, interviewing workers, and comparing actual workplace conditions against documented procedures.
The safety manager is responsible for ensuring that all notifiable incidents are reported to the regulator within the timeframes prescribed by Part 3 of the WHS Act 2011. A notifiable incident includes the death of a person, a serious injury or illness, or a dangerous incident as defined in sections 35 to 37. The scene of a notifiable incident must be preserved until an inspector directs otherwise. Beyond regulatory notification, the safety manager must conduct or commission an investigation that identifies root causes and implements corrective actions. Investigation reports must be retained for the periods specified in the WHS Regulation 2025 and made available to health and safety representatives upon request. Common prosecution triggers include failure to notify within the required timeframe, inadequate investigation that fails to prevent recurrence, and destruction or alteration of incident scene evidence. The safety manager should maintain a digital incident register with automatic escalation workflows to ensure no notification deadline is missed and every corrective action is tracked to completion.
Regulators consistently identify the same failures in safety manager practice. These include risk assessments that have not been reviewed after a workplace change, training records that cannot be produced during an inspection, incident investigations that stop at the immediate cause without examining systemic factors, and management systems that exist on paper but are not followed in practice. The distinction between a documented system and a functioning system is critical. In SafeWork NSW v Modus Constructions Pty Ltd (2023), the court found that the PCBU had a comprehensive safety management system but the safety manager had failed to ensure it was implemented on site. The resulting penalty exceeded $800,000. Safety managers must also be aware that under Section 26A, binding codes of practice take effect from 1 July 2026, meaning that departure from a code must be justified with evidence of an equally safe or safer alternative. The personal liability exposure for safety managers increases when they hold delegated authority from the PCBU and fail to exercise it competently.
EHS Atlas helps safety managers maintain WHS Regulation 2025 compliant management systems with automated risk registers, incident workflows, and audit scheduling.
Contact Us