Conveyors are ubiquitous in manufacturing facilities and present nip point entrapment hazards at every roller, pulley, and belt junction. Workers have been killed and severely injured by being drawn into in-running nip points while attempting to clear jams, clean belts, or retrieve fallen products during conveyor operation. The speed and force of conveyor systems means that once entrapment begins, the worker cannot self-rescue. Emergency stop systems, guarding of in-running nip points, and lockout tagout procedures for cleaning and maintenance are the critical controls. This template maps controls to the binding Managing Risks of Plant Code of Practice effective 1 July 2026.
WHS Regulation 2025 Part 4.7 — Plant
Plant with entrapment risk
Managing Risks of Plant in the Workplace (binding 1 July 2026 under Section 26A)
Yes — effective 1 July 2026. Non-compliance is admissible as evidence of breach.
| Hazard | Consequence | Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
| Entrapment at in-running nip points between belt and rollers | Amputation, crush injuries, death | Possible |
| Entrapment in screw conveyor auger | Severe laceration, amputation, death | Unlikely |
| Struck by product falling from elevated conveyor sections | Head injuries, fractures | Possible |
| Clothing or body part drawn into unguarded tail pulley | Entanglement, amputation, death | Possible |
| Jam clearing while conveyor is running | Hand entrapment, amputation | Possible |
| Falls from elevated conveyor walkways during maintenance | Fractures, head injuries | Possible |
Worker killed in manufacturing equipment entrapment with inadequate guarding and isolation procedures.
2024 — SafeWork SA Manufacturing Prosecution [2024]
Multiple plant safety failures in industrial operations.
2024 — SafeWork NSW v Orica Australia Pty Ltd [2024]
Our WHS consultants build conveyor-specific SWMS that address nip point guarding, emergency stops, and LOTO for your conveyor systems.
Contact Us